Cyborg Finance

Rent increase application struck out date error

The tribunal struck out the tenant’s market-rent application for lack of jurisdiction following a challenge to the landlord’s notice. No new rent was determined. The tenancy began on 1 March 2020. The tribunal treated the monthly tenancy periods as starting on the first day of each month. However, the landlord proposed that the £1,000 increase take effect on 15 July 2026.

Original Rent (PCM)

£2,000.00

Proposed Rent (PCM)

£3,000.00

Assessed Market Rent (PCM)

Not recorded

New Rent (PCM)

£2,000.00

PCM means per calendar month. Non-monthly rents are converted to monthly equivalents for comparison. The assessed market rent can exceed the landlord’s proposal. New Rent is the payable amount after any statutory cap. A strike-out is not a rent determination; a new rent shown for a struck-out case is the rent the parties agreed, not a figure set by the tribunal.

Notice Dated

14 May 2026

Notice Served

14 May 2026

Tenant Referral

12 Jun 2026

Decision Date

5 Oct 2026

New Rent Start Date

Not recorded
Case reference
LON/00AM/MRA/2026/0026
Outcome
Struck out
Legal regime
Renters’ Rights Act 2025 — post-1 May 2026 notice
Property address
Flat 5 Priory Court, Brooksbys Walk, Homerton, London E9 6DG
Property postcode
E9 6DG
Published by GOV.UK
21 October 2026
AI extraction updated
31 October 2026

Landlord’s position and arguments

The landlord served a notice of increase dated 14 May 2026 proposing to increase the rent from £2,000 to £3,000 per month with effect from 15 July 2026. No written representations were received from the landlord in connection with the application.

Tenant’s position and arguments

The tenant referred the notice to the tribunal and argued that the notice might not be legally valid, including because it did not appear to take effect at the commencement of a new period of the tenancy or an agreed rent payment date.

Tribunal reasoning and decision

The tribunal considered a notice proposing a new rent from 15 July 2026 when the tenancy period began on the 1st of the month. It held that it lacked jurisdiction to determine the validity dispute and struck out the application under rule 9(2)(a). It stated that the proposed rent was not payable unless the County Court determined the notice valid, while making clear that validity was ultimately a matter for that court. It also noted that the landlord could serve a further notice. No new rent was determined.

Original sources

These facts and summaries were extracted using AI and may contain errors. Read the original documents for the tribunal’s authoritative decision. This page is information only, not legal advice.

For a correction or removal request, contact us and quote the case reference.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: HM Courts & Tribunals Service. No official endorsement is implied.

Get in touch

We are your online mortgage broker, offering you the convenience of applying for a mortgage online. However, we understand that sometimes you may prefer to speak with a human - phone, email or in person.

Phone number
01133 205 902
Postal address
31 Bradford Chamber Business Park,
New Lane, Bradford, BD4 8BX

Looking for a career in Mortgage Advice? View job openings.

Your message
Your Name
Your Email
Your Phone Number

Please provide either an email address or a phone number so we can reply. Name and message are optional.

FCA Authorised

We are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (No. 919921). The Financial Conduct Authority does not regulate most Buy to Let mortgages.

Think carefully before securing other debts against your home. Your home may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage.

Our initial consultation is free. If you choose to proceed, we’ll explain any broker fees upfront before you commit.

British Company

Cyborg Finance Limited is registered in England and Wales (No. 12131863) at Bradford Chamber, New Lane, Bradford, BD4 8BX.